Re: NTP license question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/03/2018 12:42 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
> There is another implementation at e.g.
> https://github.com/p11-glue/p11-kit/blob/master/common/pkcs11.h
> 
> I don't know how clean a reimplementation that is, from the copyright
> point of view. It says:
> 
> 
> /* This file is a modified implementation of the PKCS #11 standard by
>    OASIS group.  It is mostly a drop-in replacement, with the
>    following change: ...
> 
> 
> I believe it came from libp11. It was introduced there in a commit
> entitled "replace rsa header files with rewrite":
> https://github.com/OpenSC/libp11/commit/af542d4bb621af2fe3ae6fdd20479ad04473e1bc
> 
> ... which would tend to suggest that it was intended to be a cleanly-
> licensed reimplementation.

That is useful to know. Assuming that GPL-compatibility is a concern,
moving to that implementation would be a plausible solution.

Thanks,

~tom
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/2LD6GGDK45C23D5GHOICFJOHWZAWO25V/




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux