Re: CDDL 1.0 and 1.1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 11/03/2017 03:22 PM, Fernando Nasser wrote:
> How should I proceed to get the CDDL 1.1 added to our list?
> 
> 
> Should we make the new short name "CDDL 1.1" and leave the 1.0 one as
> just "CDDL" or should we make it "CDDL 1.0" so packages using that
> eventually get the License tag updated?

I've added CDDL 1.1 to the list (shortname "CDDL-1.1"), and relabeled
"CDDL" to "CDDL-1.0". I used the SPDX identifiers because there is no
reason not to do so here.

I'm also going to send an email to the devel list requesting that
maintainers of packages with the CDDL license tag revisit their package
to determine which version of CDDL is in use.

Thanks,

~tom
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux