Fedora Legal - Date Index
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: MP3 status?
- Re: MP3 status?
- Re: MP3 status?
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: legal Digest, Vol 110, Issue 2
- Re: legal Digest, Vol 110, Issue 2
- Re: MP3 status?
- Re: MP3 status?
- Re: MP3 status?
- Re: MP3 status?
- Re: MP3 status?
- Re: MP3 status?
- Re: MP3 status?
- Re: MP3 status?
- Re: MP3 status?
- Re: MP3 status?
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: MP3 status?
- Re: MP3 status?
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- MP3 status?
- Fwd: Trilinos license
- Re: Fedora Core License
- Re: Licensing question re: assembly include file from Texas Instruments
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Licensing question re: assembly include file from Texas Instruments
- Re: Licensing question re: assembly include file from Texas Instruments
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Licensing question re: assembly include file from Texas Instruments
- Re: OCB blockcipher mode - is it allowed?
- OCB blockcipher mode - is it allowed?
- Re: Tumbolia Public License
- Tumbolia Public License
- Re: Switching to SPDX in license tags redux
- Re: Question about licensing my own code
- Question about licensing my own code
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: arpy and pyelftools ok for Fedora?
- Re: Switching to SPDX in license tags redux
- Re: Switching to SPDX in license tags redux
- Re: arpy and pyelftools ok for Fedora?
- arpy and pyelftools ok for Fedora?
- Re: Switching to SPDX in license tags redux
- Re: Switching to SPDX in license tags redux
- Re: About Facebook updated open source patent grant
- Re: Switching to SPDX in license tags redux
- From: Stanislav Ochotnicky
- Re: Switching to SPDX in license tags redux
- Re: Switching to SPDX in license tags redux
- Re: Switching to SPDX in license tags redux
- Re: About Facebook updated open source patent grant
- Re: Switching to SPDX in license tags redux
- Re: About Facebook updated open source patent grant
- Re: Switching to SPDX in license tags redux
- Re: About Facebook updated open source patent grant
- Re: Switching to SPDX in license tags redux
- Re: Switching to SPDX in license tags redux
- Re: Switching to SPDX in license tags redux
- About Facebook updated open source patent grant
- Re: Switching to SPDX in license tags redux
- Re: Switching to SPDX in license tags redux
- Switching to SPDX in license tags redux
- Re: "Fedora Incubator/Innovator/Experimental" branding
- Re: "Fedora Incubator/Innovator/Experimental" branding
- Re: "Fedora Incubator/Innovator/Experimental" branding
- Re: "Fedora Incubator/Innovator/Experimental" branding
- Re: "Fedora Incubator/Innovator/Experimental" branding
- Re: "Fedora Incubator/Innovator/Experimental" branding
- Re: "Fedora Incubator/Innovator/Experimental" branding
- Re: "Fedora Incubator/Innovator/Experimental" branding
- Re: "Fedora Incubator/Innovator/Experimental" branding
- "Fedora Incubator/Innovator/Experimental" branding
- Re: License files in debuginfo packages
- Re: License files in debuginfo packages
- Re: License files in debuginfo packages
- Re: License files in debuginfo packages
- Re: License files in debuginfo packages
- Re: Sleepycat license with SaaS restriction
- From: Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk
- Re: License files in debuginfo packages
- License files in debuginfo packages
- Re: Sleepycat license with SaaS restriction
- Re: Sleepycat license with SaaS restriction
- Re: Sleepycat license with SaaS restriction
- Re: Sleepycat license with SaaS restriction
- Re: Sleepycat license with SaaS restriction
- Re: Sleepycat license compatibility and GPL version 3
- Sleepycat license with SaaS restriction
- Sleepycat license compatibility and GPL version 3
- Re: Earliest use of Fedora CLA
- Re: Earliest use of Fedora CLA
- Re: Earliest use of Fedora CLA
- Re: Earliest use of Fedora CLA
- Re: Earliest use of Fedora CLA
- Re: Earliest use of Fedora CLA
- Re: Earliest use of Fedora CLA
- Re: Earliest use of Fedora CLA
- Re: Earliest use of Fedora CLA
- Re: Earliest use of Fedora CLA
- Earliest use of Fedora CLA
- Licensing of code derived from Apache 2.0 data
- Re: exfat not mentioned on Forbidden items wiki page
- Re: exfat not mentioned on Forbidden items wiki page
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- exfat not mentioned on Forbidden items wiki page
- Re: Policy change on emulators
- Re: Policy change on emulators
- Re: Policy change on emulators
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Policy change on emulators
- Re: Policy change on emulators
- Re: Policy change on emulators
- Re: Policy change on emulators
- Re: Policy change on emulators
- Re: Policy change on emulators
- Re: Policy change on emulators
- Re: Policy change on emulators
- Re: Policy change on emulators
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: Policy change on emulators
- Re: Policy change on emulators
- Re: Policy change on emulators
- From: Michael Cronenworth
- Policy change on emulators
- Re: pngquant dual-licensing note
- Re: pngquant dual-licensing note
- Re: pngquant dual-licensing note
- pngquant dual-licensing note
- Re: Game emulators in Copr
- possibly non-free bundled library (liberi) not caught in the review of openmx
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Game emulators in Copr
- From: Michael Cronenworth
- Re: TeX licensing
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: TeX licensing
- Re: TeX licensing
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- TeX licensing
- Re: MMIX
- Re: MMIX
- Re: MMIX
- Re: MMIX
- MMIX
- [Fedora-legal-list] [Fedora-legal-list] Re: The limit of "free for non commercial use"
- The limit of "free for non commercial use"
- Re: Custom license for bencode.js
- Re: Custom license for bencode.js
- Re: Custom license for bencode.js
- Custom license for bencode.js
- Re: OSGi Enterprise licensing
- Re: OSGi Enterprise licensing
- Re: OSGi Enterprise licensing
- Re: OSGi Enterprise licensing
- Re: OSGi Enterprise licensing
- Re: OSGi Enterprise licensing
- OSGi Enterprise licensing
- Re: CAcert.org license
- Re: CAcert.org license
- [Fedora-legal-list] Re: [GPL] Can we update the address of FSF address, and change the organization for deviated work?
- [Fedora-legal-list] [GPL] Can we update the address of FSF address, and change the organization for deviated work?
- [Fedora-legal-list] Re: umefont license
- Re: umefont license
- Re: umefont license
- umefont license
- Re: Confusion between GPL-3.0 and GPL-3.0+
- Re: Confusion between GPL-3.0 and GPL-3.0+
- Re: Confusion between GPL-3.0 and GPL-3.0+
- Re: Confusion between GPL-3.0 and GPL-3.0+
- Confusion between GPL-3.0 and GPL-3.0+
- Understanding of 'Compatibility Matrix' granularity?
- Re: CC Non-Commercial License question
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- CC Non-Commercial License question
- Have the US MP3 patents expired?
- Re: perl-Unix-Mknod license
- perl-Unix-Mknod license
- Re: FreeSurfer/FSL license issues for NeuroFedora
- Re: FreeSurfer/FSL license issues for NeuroFedora
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- FreeSurfer/FSL license issues for NeuroFedora
- Re: tktable license clarification
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: tktable license clarification
- tktable license clarification
- Re: reg. fedora name as trademark
- Re: Packaging of PlayOnLinux
- Packaging of PlayOnLinux
- Re: Logos on Fedora Developer Portal
- Logos on Fedora Developer Portal
- Re: LICENSE file for spec files
- Re: LICENSE file for spec files
- Re: LICENSE file for spec files
- Re: LICENSE file for spec files
- Re: LICENSE file for spec files
- Re: LICENSE file for spec files
- Re: LICENSE file for spec files
- Re: LICENSE file for spec files
- LICENSE file for spec files
- Re: Adding Red Hat product installers to EPEL
- Re: Adding Red Hat product installers to EPEL
- Re: Adding Red Hat product installers to EPEL
- Re: Adding Red Hat product installers to EPEL
- Re: Adding Red Hat product installers to EPEL
- Re: Adding Red Hat product installers to EPEL
- Re: Adding Red Hat product installers to EPEL
- Re: Adding Red Hat product installers to EPEL
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Adding Red Hat product installers to EPEL
- Copr logo as an unregistered trademark of Red Hat
- Re: ZPAQ
- ZPAQ
- Re: perl-Net-HL7's Beerware license variant
- Re: perl-Net-HL7's Beerware license variant
- perl-Net-HL7's Beerware license variant
- Re: winetricks
- Re: winetricks
- Re: [RFC] Switching to SPDX in license tags
- Re: winetricks
- Re: [RFC] Switching to SPDX in license tags
- Re: [RFC] Switching to SPDX in license tags
- Re: winetricks
- Re: [RFC] Switching to SPDX in license tags
- Re: [RFC] Switching to SPDX in license tags
- Re: winetricks
- Re: winetricks
- Re: Screen captures from movies/TV shows
- Screen captures from movies/TV shows
- Re: [RFC] Switching to SPDX in license tags
- Re: [RFC] Switching to SPDX in license tags
- Re: [RFC] Switching to SPDX in license tags
- [RFC] Switching to SPDX in license tags
- Re: [RFC] Switching to SPDX in license tags
- Re: [RFC] Switching to SPDX in license tags
- Re: [RFC] Switching to SPDX in license tags
- Re: [RFC] Switching to SPDX in license tags
- Re: [RFC] Switching to SPDX in license tags
- Re: [RFC] Switching to SPDX in license tags
- Re: [RFC] Switching to SPDX in license tags
- Re: [RFC] Switching to SPDX in license tags
- Re: [RFC] Switching to SPDX in license tags
- Re: [RFC] Switching to SPDX in license tags
- Re: [RFC] Switching to SPDX in license tags
- From: Stanislav Ochotnicky
- Re: [RFC] Switching to SPDX in license tags
- Re: [RFC] Switching to SPDX in license tags
- Re: [RFC] Switching to SPDX in license tags
- Re: [RFC] Switching to SPDX in license tags
- Re: [RFC] Switching to SPDX in license tags
- Re: [RFC] Switching to SPDX in license tags
- Re: [RFC] Switching to SPDX in license tags
- Re: [RFC] Switching to SPDX in license tags
- Re: [RFC] Switching to SPDX in license tags
- Re: [RFC] Switching to SPDX in license tags
- Re: [RFC] Switching to SPDX in license tags
- Re: [RFC] Switching to SPDX in license tags
- [RFC] Switching to SPDX in license tags
- Re: GPLv2/v3 confusion
- GPLv2/v3 confusion
- Re: stop spamming me
- Re: [Fedora-packaging] MHDAC, MSFileReader, WRDAC, Wiff Reader Library licenses
- MHDAC, MSFileReader, WRDAC, Wiff Reader Library licenses
- Re: Can 7kaa has music?
- Can 7kaa has music?
- Re: libdvdcss and XFS status
- Re: libdvdcss and XFS status
- Re: libdvdcss and XFS status
- Re: libdvdcss and XFS status
- libdvdcss and XFS status
- Re: Metamail license
- Re: Metamail license
- Re: Privacy policy
- Re: Privacy policy
- Re: Privacy policy
- Re: Privacy policy
- Re: Privacy policy
- Re: Privacy policy
- Re: Privacy policy
- Re: Privacy policy
- Re: Privacy policy
- Re: Privacy policy
- Re: Privacy policy
- Re: Privacy policy
- Re: Privacy policy
- Re: Privacy policy
- Re: Privacy policy
- Re: Henry Spencer's license
- Re: Henry Spencer's license
- Re: a derivative of the Linux Documentation Project License
- Re: Henry Spencer's license
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: updating embargoed nations wiki page -- board to council
- Metamail license
- updating embargoed nations wiki page -- board to council
- Re: Prominent notice of changes
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Prominent notice of changes
- Re: Henry Spencer's license
- Re: Prominent notice of changes
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Prominent notice of changes (Was: Suitability of EPICS Open License)
- Re: New "Artistic clarified" LICENSE
- New "Artistic clarified" LICENSE
- Henry Spencer's license
- Prominent notice of changes (Was: Suitability of EPICS Open License)
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Suitability of EPICS Open License
- Re: Suitability of EPICS Open License
- Re: license question about a new package
- Re: license question about a new package
- Re: objenesis - files with unclear licensing
- objenesis - files with unclear licensing
- Re: license question about a new package
- Re: license question about a new package
- license question about a new package
- license question about a new package
- Suitability of EPICS Open License
- Re: [Fedora-packaging] questions about license file migration
- Re: [Fedora-packaging] questions about license file migration
- Re: [Fedora-packaging] questions about license file migration
- Re: a derivative of the Linux Documentation Project License
- a derivative of the Linux Documentation Project License
- Re: About automated scratch-build
- Re: About automated scratch-build
- Re: Is this just MIT?
- Re: Is this just MIT?
- Re: Is this just MIT?
- Is this just MIT?
- About automated scratch-build
- Re: Privacy policy
- Re: Privacy policy
- Re: Privacy policy
- Re: Privacy policy
- Re: Privacy policy
- xdrawchem: free or non-free code?
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: CC-BY-SA version ?
- CC-BY-SA version ?
- Re: Privacy policy
- Re: 04Font licensing
- Re: 04Font licensing
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: 04Font licensing
- Re: 04Font licensing
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- 04Font licensing
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- GPLv3+GPLv2 with runtime exceptions
- Legally questionable images in cairo-dock-plug-ins (under review)
- Re: Privacy policy
- Re: Privacy policy
- Re: Privacy policy
- Legality of Sourcing
- From: Somers-Harris, David | David | OPS
- Re: Privacy policy
- Re: Privacy policy
- Re: Privacy policy
- Re: Privacy policy
- Re: Privacy policy
- Re: Privacy policy
- Privacy policy
- Re: Can Copr use rpmfusion?
- Re: Can Copr use rpmfusion?
- Re: QPL with exceptions
- Re: QPL with exceptions
- Re: QPL with exceptions
- Re: QPL with exceptions
- QPL with exceptions
- Re: Can Copr use rpmfusion?
- Can Copr use rpmfusion?
- Re: URGENT! REMOVAL REQUEST! From the Netherlands
- Re: Software with no license rubygem-sshkeyauth
- Software with no license rubygem-sshkeyauth
- Re: Transitive Grace Period Public LIcense ("TGGPL") v. 1.0
- Re: Transitive Grace Period Public LIcense ("TGGPL") v. 1.0
- Re: Transitive Grace Period Public LIcense ("TGGPL") v. 1.0
- Re: Apache license text in ruby gems
- Apache license text in ruby gems
- Transitive Grace Period Public LIcense ("TGGPL") v. 1.0
- Re: UROnode licensing question
- Re: UROnode licensing question
- Re: UROnode licensing question
- Re: UROnode licensing question
- Re: Claims about Fair License
- From: Vassilis Palassopoulos
- Re: Claims about Fair License
- Re: Claims about Fair License
- From: Vassilis Palassopoulos
- Re: Claims about Fair License
- Re: Claims about Fair License
- From: Vassilis Palassopoulos
- Claims about Fair License
- From: Vassilis Palassopoulos
- Re: opencascade lgpl 2.1 exception
- Re: opencascade lgpl 2.1 exception
- opencascade lgpl 2.1 exception
- we need updated trademark / logo guidelines for cloud / server / workstation
- Re: reg. fedora name as trademark
- Re: reg. fedora name as trademark
- reg. fedora name as trademark
- Re: clarifying license of rubygem-posix-spawn
- clarifying license of rubygem-posix-spawn
- Re: CC-BY 2.0 ... but with restrictions?
- Re: CC-BY 2.0 ... but with restrictions?
- CC-BY 2.0 ... but with restrictions?
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: Unicode License
- Unicode License
- Re: SDCC: Is non-free tree actually non-free?
- SDCC: Is non-free tree actually non-free?
- Re: Is MSR-LA considered as free?
- Re: Ambiguous license stated by upstream
- Re: Is MSR-LA considered as free?
- Ambiguous license stated by upstream
- From: Eduardo Mayorga Téllez
- Re: Is MSR-LA considered as free?
- Is MSR-LA considered as free?
- Re: Linking of GPL-only and GPL-incompatible libraries
- Re: License field: linked libraries considered?
- License field: linked libraries considered?
- Re: License tag for the minimal BSD license
- Python license: broken link
- License tag for the minimal BSD license
- Re: axmail licensing question
- Re: axmail licensing question
- Re: axmail licensing question
- axmail licensing question
- Re: UROnode licensing question
- Re: UROnode licensing question
- Re: UROnode licensing question
- UROnode licensing question
- Re: Modified version of ASL 2.0
- Re: Modified version of ASL 2.0
- Re: Modified version of ASL 2.0
- Re: License clarification for perl-App-s2p
- License clarification for perl-App-s2p
- Re: CC BY-SA 3.0 -> 4.0
- Re: CC BY-SA 3.0 -> 4.0
- Re: CC BY-SA 3.0 -> 4.0
- From: Eric H. Christensen
- Re: CC BY-SA 3.0 -> 4.0
- From: Eric H. Christensen
- Re: CC BY-SA 3.0 -> 4.0
- Re: CC BY-SA 3.0 -> 4.0
- CC BY-SA 3.0 -> 4.0
- From: Eric H. Christensen
- Re: Including gpl3 code and how that affects other source in project
- Re: repoze.sphinx.autointerface license
- Re: repoze.sphinx.autointerface license
- repoze.sphinx.autointerface license
- Re: Including gpl3 code and how that affects other source in project
- ZPL links need updating
- Re: Including gpl3 code and how that affects other source in project
- Re: Including gpl3 code and how that affects other source in project
- Re: Including gpl3 code and how that affects other source in project
- Re: Including gpl3 code and how that affects other source in project
- Including gpl3 code and how that affects other source in project
- Re: Warsow Content License
- Re: Warsow Content License
- Re: Warsow Content License
- Warsow Content License
- Re: Source Requirements
- Re: Source Requirements
- Re: Source Requirements
- Re: JBIG2
- JBIG2
- Re: Allow to delete builds/coprs from playground?
- Re: Allow to delete builds/coprs from playground?
- Re: Allow to delete builds/coprs from playground? (was: Re: Meeting minute from Env-and-Stacks WG meeting (2014-04-15))
- Re: Allow to delete builds/coprs from playground? (was: Re: Meeting minute from Env-and-Stacks WG meeting (2014-04-15))
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: Allow to delete builds/coprs from playground? (was: Re: Meeting minute from Env-and-Stacks WG meeting (2014-04-15))
- Allow to delete builds/coprs from playground? (was: Re: Meeting minute from Env-and-Stacks WG meeting (2014-04-15))
- Re: Copyright Submission Proposal
- Re: Copyright Submission Proposal
- Re: Copyright Submission Proposal
- Re: Copyright Submission Proposal
- Re: Copyright Submission Proposal
- Re: Copyright Submission Proposal
- Re: Copyright Submission Proposal
- Re: Copyright Submission Proposal
- Re: Copyright Submission Proposal
- Re: Copyright Submission Proposal
- Re: Copyright Submission Proposal
- Re: Copyright Submission Proposal
- Re: Spread Open-Source License
- Re: Spread Open-Source License
- Re: Is such restriction acceptable
- Re: Is such restriction acceptable
- Re: Spread Open-Source License
- Is such restriction acceptable
- Spread Open-Source License
- Re: Is this reference to rpmfusion OK?
- Re: Is this reference to rpmfusion OK?
- Re: Is this reference to rpmfusion OK?
- Re: Is this reference to rpmfusion OK?
- Is this reference to rpmfusion OK?
- Re: Legal flag raised on PPSSPP
- Re: Legal flag raised on PPSSPP
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: Legal flag raised on PPSSPP
- Re: Legal flag raised on PPSSPP
- Re: Legal flag raised on PPSSPP
- Re: Legal flag raised on PPSSPP
- Re: Legal flag raised on PPSSPP
- Re: Legal flag raised on PPSSPP
- Re: Legal flag raised on PPSSPP
- Re: Legal flag raised on PPSSPP
- Re: Legal flag raised on PPSSPP
- Re: Legal flag raised on PPSSPP
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: Legal flag raised on PPSSPP
- Re: Legal flag raised on PPSSPP
- Re: Retaining old binaries and SRPMs vs package git
- Re: Linking of GPL-only and GPL-incompatible libraries
- Re: Linking of GPL-only and GPL-incompatible libraries
- Re: Modified version of ASL 2.0
- Re: Modified version of ASL 2.0
- Modified version of ASL 2.0
- Re: python ecdsa module
- python ecdsa module
- Re: Retaining old binaries and SRPMs vs package git
- Re: Requirements for an official Fedora account for Google Cloud Engine
- Re: Retaining old binaries and SRPMs vs package git
- Retaining old binaries and SRPMs vs package git
- Re: Use of IBM AIX logo
- Re: Use of IBM AIX logo
- Re: Use of IBM AIX logo
- Re: Source Requirements
- Re: Source Requirements
- Re: Source Requirements
- Requirements for an official Fedora account for Google Cloud Engine
- Re: Source Requirements
- Source Requirements
- Re: Time::ParseDate license clarification
- Time::ParseDate license clarification
- Re: Software of Sudanese origin in Fedora
- Re: Software of Sudanese origin in Fedora
- Re: Licensing of Apache UIMAJ
- Licensing of Apache UIMAJ
- Re: DITA licence -- acceptable?
- Re: Using 'fedora' in a github organization name
- Re: Using 'fedora' in a github organization name
- Re: Using 'fedora' in a github organization name
- Using 'fedora' in a github organization name
- Re: DITA licence -- acceptable?
- Re: DITA licence -- acceptable?
- Re: DITA licence -- acceptable?
- Re: DITA licence -- acceptable?
- Re: Nmap License
- Re: Exceptions restricting program name are compatible with "LGPLv2 with exceptions", correct?
- Re: Nmap License
- Nmap License
- Re: Exceptions restricting program name are compatible with "LGPLv2 with exceptions", correct?
- Re: Clarification for Packaging:JavaScript#CompilationMinification
- Clarification for Packaging:JavaScript#CompilationMinification
- From: Stanislav Ochotnicky
- Re: Software of Sudanese origin in Fedora
- Re: Software of Sudanese origin in Fedora
- Re: Use of IBM AIX logo
- Re: Software of Sudanese origin in Fedora
- Re: Software of Sudanese origin in Fedora
- Re: Software of Sudanese origin in Fedora
- Software of Sudanese origin in Fedora
- Re: DITA licence -- acceptable?
- Providing machine readable list of licenses
- Re: Android Emoji font permissible in Fedora?
- Android Emoji font permissible in Fedora?
- Re: Use of IBM AIX logo
- Use of IBM AIX logo
- Re: FDLIBM license
- From: Milan Bouchet-Valat
- Re: OpenCASCADE now under LGPL v2.1 plus exception
- Re: FDLIBM license
- Re: OpenCASCADE now under LGPL v2.1 plus exception
- OpenCASCADE now under LGPL v2.1 plus exception
- FDLIBM license
- From: Milan Bouchet-Valat
- Re: Any legal issues against Bumblebee and bbswitch?
- Any legal issues against Bumblebee and bbswitch?
- Any legal issues against Bumblebee and bbswitch?
- Re: Linking of GPL-only and GPL-incompatible libraries
- Re: Exceptions restricting program name are compatible with "LGPLv2 with exceptions", correct?
- Re: Exceptions restricting program name are compatible with "LGPLv2 with exceptions", correct?
- Re: Exceptions restricting program name are compatible with "LGPLv2 with exceptions", correct?
- Re: Linking of GPL-only and GPL-incompatible libraries
- Re: Linking of GPL-only and GPL-incompatible libraries
- Re: Exceptions restricting program name are compatible with "LGPLv2 with exceptions", correct?
- Re: Exceptions restricting program name are compatible with "LGPLv2 with exceptions", correct?
- Re: Exceptions restricting program name are compatible with "LGPLv2 with exceptions", correct?
- Re: Creative Commons 4.0
- Re: Exceptions restricting program name are compatible with "LGPLv2 with exceptions", correct?
- Creative Commons 4.0
- Re: Exceptions restricting program name are compatible with "LGPLv2 with exceptions", correct?
- Re: Exceptions restricting program name are compatible with "LGPLv2 with exceptions", correct?
- Re: Exceptions restricting program name are compatible with "LGPLv2 with exceptions", correct?
- Exceptions restricting program name are compatible with "LGPLv2 with exceptions", correct?
- Re: XML::Parser::Lite license
- Re: XML::Parser::Lite license
- Re: Wiki page about blobs, proprietary kernel and firmwares
- Wiki page about blobs, proprietary kernel and firmwares
- Re: XML::Parser::Lite license
- Re: Linking of GPL-only and GPL-incompatible libraries
- Re: Linking of GPL-only and GPL-incompatible libraries
- XML::Parser::Lite license
- Re: Linking of GPL-only and GPL-incompatible libraries
- Re: Linking of GPL-only and GPL-incompatible libraries
- lutris
- Re: Linking of GPL-only and GPL-incompatible libraries
- Re: GPLv2+ library in AGPLv3 application
- Re: GPLv2+ library in AGPLv3 application
- GPLv2+ library in AGPLv3 application
- Re: Linking of GPL-only and GPL-incompatible libraries
- Re: Google compute engine + trusted testers
- Re: Google compute engine + trusted testers
- Re: Google compute engine + trusted testers
- Google compute engine + trusted testers
- Linking of GPL-only and GPL-incompatible libraries
- Re: Allowed content in Copr
- Re: License of jnlp-servlet.jar - part of Oracle JDK
- Re: License of jnlp-servlet.jar - part of Oracle JDK
- Re: License of jnlp-servlet.jar - part of Oracle JDK
- Re: License of jnlp-servlet.jar - part of Oracle JDK
- Re: License of jnlp-servlet.jar - part of Oracle JDK
- Re: License of jnlp-servlet.jar - part of Oracle JDK
- Re: License of jnlp-servlet.jar - part of Oracle JDK
- Re: License of jnlp-servlet.jar - part of Oracle JDK
- Re: License of jnlp-servlet.jar - part of Oracle JDK
- License of jnlp-servlet.jar - part of Oracle JDK
- Re: Allowed content in Copr
- From: Karsten 'quaid' Wade
- Re: Allowed content in Copr
- Re: Allowed content in Copr
- Re: Allowed content in Copr
- Re: Allowed content in Copr
- Re: Allowed content in Copr
- Re: Allowed content in Copr
- Re: Allowed content in Copr
- Greetings from an articling student
- Re: Allowed content in Copr
- Re: Allowed content in Copr
- Confirmation about the pptpd license tag
- Allowed content in Copr
- Re: Can we get an official fedora position on OpenH264?
- Re: Can we get an official fedora position on OpenH264?
- Re: Can we get an official fedora position on OpenH264?
- Re: Packages have "proxy" word.
- Re: Packages have "proxy" word.
- From: Stanislav Ochotnicky
- Blessing Request on a Modified LGPL v2.1
- Re: Trademark issue: "ubuntu" in package name
- Re: FIPL for freeimage
- FIPL for freeimage
- Re: Trademark issue: "ubuntu" in package name
- Re: Trademark issue: "ubuntu" in package name
- Re: Trademark issue: "ubuntu" in package name
- Re: Trademark issue: "ubuntu" in package name
- Re: Trademark issue: "ubuntu" in package name
- Re: Trademark issue: "ubuntu" in package name
- Re: Trademark issue: "ubuntu" in package name
- Re: Trademark issue: "ubuntu" in package name
- Re: Trademark issue: "ubuntu" in package name
- Re: Trademark issue: "ubuntu" in package name
- Re: Trademark issue: "ubuntu" in package name
- Re: Trademark issue: "ubuntu" in package name
- Re: Trademark issue: "ubuntu" in package name
- Trademark issue: "ubuntu" in package name
- Re: Hosting Fedora cloud images
- Re: Hosting Fedora cloud images
- Re: Hosting Fedora cloud images
- Hosting Fedora cloud images
- Re: CC0 AppData
- CC0 AppData
- Re: At which stage in Fedora does upstream code become "Fedora Software"
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: At which stage in Fedora does upstream code become "Fedora Software"
- Re: At which stage in Fedora does upstream code become "Fedora Software"
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: At which stage in Fedora does upstream code become "Fedora Software"
- At which stage in Fedora does upstream code become "Fedora Software"
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: Rancid 3.0 License Change
- Rancid 3.0 License Change
- Re: A license inquiry
- A license inquiry
- Re: including full license texts
- Re: including full license texts
- Enable SRP
- including full license texts
- Re: icon trademarks
- icon trademarks
- Re: Question about the Supplemental Wallpaper Submission Guidelines
- Question about the Supplemental Wallpaper Submission Guidelines
- Re: Application metadata
- Application metadata
- Re: Various licenses in Heimdal
- Various licenses in Heimdal
- Re: xephem license
- xephem license
- Re: MIT variant in perl-Data-UUID?
- MIT variant in perl-Data-UUID?
- Re: License clarification for perl-Encode
- License clarification for perl-Encode
- Re: Possible CC BY violation
- Re: Possible CC BY violation
- Possible CC BY violation
- python-backports: 2 lines of code (RHBZ 998047)
- Re: Font license question
- Re: Font license question
- Re: Font license question
- Re: Font license question
- Font license question
- npm license change
- Re: Use license of another project, even, when it's changed
- Re: Use license of another project, even, when it's changed
- Re: Use license of another project, even, when it's changed
[Index of Archives]
[Fedora Users]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Fedora SELinux]
[Linux Kernel]