On 11/11/2013 10:35 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: >> We really didn't want to have to review all the non-free licenses out >> there to determine whether they were freely distributable without >> restriction, especially since we know that the majority of these >> licenses are not. > > I believed that one can use Copr to build and distribute they own > non-free software. While I'm not overly excited about this prospect, if this is something that the Fedora community really wants to do, we can start reviewing non-free items for distributability. I suspect most people will be disappointed at how few non-free licenses permit the level of distributability necessary to be in a Copr. ~tom == Fedora Project _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
