On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 04:45:32PM -0500, inode0 wrote: > On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Paul W. Frields <stickster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 09:00:18PM +0200, Haïkel wrote: > >> I'm curious to know how *Red Hat* products > >> could depend on EPEL packages though EPEL > >> is *not* supported by Red Hat. > > > > This is not a valid assumption from what the OP said. An installation > > tool as he suggested could be independent of the product. > > May I ask what is the legal concern here? Is there a legal issue I'm missing? > > I just see EPEL policy questions really. I don't see a clear legal question either, which I think is why someone asked previously for some more details. I see a packaging guidelines question as well as EPEL policy. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
