On 09/14/2015 05:17 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote: > On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 04:45:32PM -0500, inode0 wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Paul W. Frields <stickster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 09:00:18PM +0200, Haïkel wrote: >>>> I'm curious to know how *Red Hat* products >>>> could depend on EPEL packages though EPEL >>>> is *not* supported by Red Hat. >>> >>> This is not a valid assumption from what the OP said. An installation >>> tool as he suggested could be independent of the product. >> >> May I ask what is the legal concern here? Is there a legal issue I'm missing? >> >> I just see EPEL policy questions really. > > I don't see a clear legal question either, which I think is why > someone asked previously for some more details. I see a packaging > guidelines question as well as EPEL policy. Correct. I assumed that such policy questions are settled on this list as well, to large degree at least. Am I wrong? -- Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
