On 07/28/2016 06:20 AM, Gary Benson wrote:
> Could you confirm that this is 2 clause BSD ("License: BSD") and that
> I just need to get the maintainers to add a LICENSE file for this to
> be ok for Fedora?
This is correct. Adding the LICENSE file is a nice to have, but not a
blocker, because the .py file includes the license text and the binary
package will include the .py file (presumably).
> Am I right that the second is MIT (Modern Style with sublicense) and
> that this package would have "License: Public Domain and MIT"?
Yes.
Thanks for checking,
~tom
==
Red Hat
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list
legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
