I did miss that last bit regarding a nuclear facility. That is a field of use restriction which makes the licensed software incompatible with the Open Source Definition and the definition of Free Software as defined by the Free Software Foundation. I apologize for my lack of precision. Adam Saunders -- NOTE: This email does not contain legal advice. This email also does not establish a solicitor-client relationship. You should neither take nor fail to take any action based on any information in this email. If you have a legal issue, then retain legal counsel. On 11/11/2013 04:48 PM, inode0 wrote: > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Adam Saunders > <adam.saunders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi Manuel, >> >> This is the 3-Clause BSD license, listed in the Fedora licensing list as >> "BSD License (no advertising)". Any software licensed under this license >> is a candidate for inclusion in Fedora. > > I'd like a second opinion. I don't recall that last bit in the > 3-Clause BSD license. > > John > _______________________________________________ > legal mailing list > legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
