Marek Goldmann wrote: > Most probably we'll need to package OSGi Enterprise, but I'm not sure > about licensing of this project. > > The code itself (included in the.jar file, another story...) is ASL 2.0, > but if you try to download it from the website, you need to agree to this: > > http://www.osgi.org/Download/Release5?info=nothanks > > Which is no more, no less OSGi Specification License, listed as bad > license on the wiki: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Bad_Licenses > > You can also download it directly, without the need to agree to the > license on the website: > > http://www.osgi.org/download/r4v42/osgi.enterprise.jar > http://www.osgi.org/download/r5/osgi.enterprise-5.0.0.jar > > How should we deal with it? Are we authorized to package it under ASL 2.0? > > Thanks! Hi, I am unable to find any response to this message in mail archives. The Y2016 update: * How have we dealt with this? * Are we OK to package the osgi.enterprise now? * Do we depend on osgi.enterprise namespace somewhere (Fedora/CentOS/RHEL) * if that is not Fedora friendly license, is it OK to depend on it upstream? Thanks, Pavel _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
