On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 01:20:24PM +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > Marek Goldmann wrote: > > > Most probably we'll need to package OSGi Enterprise, but I'm not sure > > about licensing of this project. > > > > The code itself (included in the.jar file, another story...) is ASL 2.0, > > but if you try to download it from the website, you need to agree to this: > > > > http://www.osgi.org/Download/Release5?info=nothanks > > > > Which is no more, no less OSGi Specification License, listed as bad > > license on the wiki: > > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Bad_Licenses > > > > You can also download it directly, without the need to agree to the > > license on the website: > > > > http://www.osgi.org/download/r4v42/osgi.enterprise.jar > > http://www.osgi.org/download/r5/osgi.enterprise-5.0.0.jar > > > > How should we deal with it? Are we authorized to package it under ASL 2.0? > > > > Thanks! > > Hi, I am unable to find any response to this message in mail archives. > > The Y2016 update: > > * How have we dealt with this? > * Are we OK to package the osgi.enterprise now? > * Do we depend on osgi.enterprise namespace somewhere > (Fedora/CentOS/RHEL) > * if that is not Fedora friendly license, is it OK to depend on it > upstream? Do you need to package anything other than the code that's under the Apache License? Richard _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
