On 05/05/2016 08:07 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: >> >>> There also seems to be an agreement not to build the software on some >>> platforms in place, that isn't reflected in the license, but might >>> attract a lawsuit if someone did. >> >> This is particularly concerning. I'd like to better understand that >> situation before giving openmw the all-clear. > > Unless you are curious, there is no need to look at it now. The FAQ > entry covering the issue (https://openmw.org/faq/#bethesda_legal) has a > link to a wiki page with their back and forth with Bethsheda which > should let you make a decision, if the people who have packaged it in > rpmfusion wish to try to get it into Fedora proper. That's a very strange situation, but I don't think it would affect inclusion of openmw in Fedora. ~tom == Red Hat _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
