On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 10:15:24AM -0400, Richard Fontana wrote: > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 03:10:26PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > > I have an idea¹ for creating a label for experimental/innovative work > > within the Fedora Project which is not ready to be (or maybe is never > > intended to be) Official Fedora. For example, release engineering wants > > to make sure that all bits that are "official" go through releng > > processes — which is totally reasonable, and helps support the high > > quality people have come to expect from the Fedora name. At the same > > time, we have a charter to be leaders, and to do that we need a space > > where we can be more flexible. > > > > The secondary mark (Fedora Remix) can provide an avenue for this, but > > it's made for work done entirely outside of the Fedora project > > umbrella. I'd like some way to label projects which are done by Fedora > > developers using Fedora resources and in line with the Fedora foundations > > but which are not part of the traditional OS or infrastructure with all > > of the expectations those things bring. > > > > From a legal standpoint: a) does this make sense and b) what would we > > need to do make it happen? > > If the idea is to have a new secondary mark - I would suggest > discussing with the Red Hat legal team. If not, I'm not sure this is > really a legal issue (other than in the sense of refining what > 'Fedora' means). AIUI this was about being able to use the *primary* marks in a controlled way, but Matthew can correct me if I'm wrong. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
