On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 03:10:26PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > I have an idea¹ for creating a label for experimental/innovative work > within the Fedora Project which is not ready to be (or maybe is never > intended to be) Official Fedora. For example, release engineering wants > to make sure that all bits that are "official" go through releng > processes — which is totally reasonable, and helps support the high > quality people have come to expect from the Fedora name. At the same > time, we have a charter to be leaders, and to do that we need a space > where we can be more flexible. > > The secondary mark (Fedora Remix) can provide an avenue for this, but > it's made for work done entirely outside of the Fedora project > umbrella. I'd like some way to label projects which are done by Fedora > developers using Fedora resources and in line with the Fedora foundations > but which are not part of the traditional OS or infrastructure with all > of the expectations those things bring. > > From a legal standpoint: a) does this make sense and b) what would we > need to do make it happen? If the idea is to have a new secondary mark - I would suggest discussing with the Red Hat legal team. If not, I'm not sure this is really a legal issue (other than in the sense of refining what 'Fedora' means). Richard _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
