On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 10:15:24AM -0400, Richard Fontana wrote: > > From a legal standpoint: a) does this make sense and b) what would we > > need to do make it happen? > If the idea is to have a new secondary mark - I would suggest > discussing with the Red Hat legal team. If not, I'm not sure this is > really a legal issue (other than in the sense of refining what > 'Fedora' means). My preliminary questions are: a) do we _need_ a new secondary mark for this, or is it something we can just declare without involving that; and b) in either case, would we need to modify the existing trademark guidelines or could this be an additive guideline? -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
