On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 01:46:05PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 10:58:09AM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > > discussing with the Red Hat legal team. If not, I'm not sure this is > > > really a legal issue (other than in the sense of refining what > > > 'Fedora' means). > > AIUI this was about being able to use the *primary* marks in a > > controlled way, but Matthew can correct me if I'm wrong. > > I freely admit to being unclear on the exact legal meaning there. > "Fedora Remix" is the current secondary mark, and also clearly includes > the primary "Fedora" trademark. Because "Fedora Remix" is an inseparable unit, I wouldn't recommend thinking of it this way. They are two different trademarks. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
