I'm sorry to dig up an ancient thread. May somebody deliver a fresh opinion on this subject, considering that the CAcert Official Document (or "COD") 14, known as the 'CACert Root Distribution License' (or "RDL"), and referenced on the Fedora Licensing page [1], and in more details on [2], went from 10-Jul-2010 DRAFT [3] to 31-Jul-2014 POLICY [4], as well as also replaced by itself the now obsolete 'CAcert Non-Related Persons Disclaimer and License', see it mentioned on [1], again. It renders [1] and [2] slightly outdated. Moreover, on 30-Oct-2011 to the Talk:[2] page referenced thereof, was added a detailed explanation of how CAcert works and how the CA business works; [and that the] conclusions [were] based on false assumption that the Root is Software. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/CACert_Root_Distribution_License Talk:[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Talk:Licensing/CACert_Root_Distribution_License [3] http://svn.cacert.org/CAcert/Policies/Agreements/RootDistributionLicense.html [4] http://www.cacert.org/policy/RootDistributionLicense.html Disclosure: I am a CAcert Certified Assurer. CAcert Inc now licenses its documents back again under open CC-by-sa+DRP license [*]. [*] https://wiki.cacert.org/Policy#Licence _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
