On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 16:36 +0100, Ciaran Farrell wrote: > Sorry, I should have been more clear about this. One of the discussion > points > was that the CaCert people were worried about liability if their > private key > were somehow to be compromised. They were therefore seeking to force > end users > to accept some type of disclaimer. To do this, they wanted > distributors to > write it directly into the EULA/SLA. Yuck. I'm not sure why they think they would have more liability if Fedora/openSUSE distribute their root certs than they would have if they only distributed them directly to end users. A traditional disclaimer of warranty should suffice in such scenarios. ~spot _______________________________________________ Fedora-legal-list mailing list Fedora-legal-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legal-list
