Fedora Legal - Date Index
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: Use license of another project, even, when it's changed
- Re: Use license of another project, even, when it's changed
- Use license of another project, even, when it's changed
- Re: License tag for single binary built from multiple sources under different licenses
- Re: License tag for single binary built from multiple sources under different licenses
- License tag for single binary built from multiple sources under different licenses
- Re: non-free licence? (Richardson laboratory software)
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: non-free licence? (Richardson laboratory software)
- non-free licence? (Richardson laboratory software)
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: Poster Competition on Women's and LGBT Issues
- Re: Poster Competition on Women's and LGBT Issues
- Poster Competition on Women's and LGBT Issues
- Re: Request for accepting LGPLv2 exceptions
- Re: Request for accepting LGPLv2 exceptions
- Re: BerkeleyDB 6.0 relicense
- Request for accepting LGPLv2 exceptions
- Re: BerkeleyDB 6.0 relicense
- From: Michel Alexandre Salim
- Re: BerkeleyDB 6.0 relicense
- BerkeleyDB 6.0 relicense
- From: Michel Alexandre Salim
- Re: libxzfile: "public domain"
- libxzfile: "public domain"
- Re: request to use the operating system Feroda
- request to use the operating system Feroda
- Re: Starting a Project
- Starting a Project
- Re: Including GPL code in the source RPM only, for an ASL 2.0 package
- Including GPL code in the source RPM only, for an ASL 2.0 package
- Re: Inconsistent licensing
- Re: JTF license agreement
- Re: JTF license agreement
- Re: JTF license agreement
- Re: Have a question about using Fedora14 for a university project and publishing the results
- Re: Have a question about using Fedora14 for a university project and publishing the results
- Have a question about using Fedora14 for a university project and publishing the results
- Re: Which BSD variant is this? (pixz)
- Which BSD variant is this? (pixz)
- Re: License clarification for xvt
- Re: JTF license agreement
- Re: Q:Trademarked logos in zocial font.
- Re: GPLv2 with exception linked with GPLv3+
- Re: This code may be freely used and modified for any purpose
- Re: License clarification for xvt
- Re: Q:Trademarked logos in zocial font.
- GPLv2 with exception linked with GPLv3+
- Q:Trademarked logos in zocial font.
- Re: This code may be freely used and modified for any purpose
- License clarification for xvt
- Re: nodejs-ansi usage of yoshi png file
- Re: nodejs-ansi usage of yoshi png file
- nodejs-ansi usage of yoshi png file
- From: Stanislav Ochotnicky
- Inconsistent licensing
- Re: JTF license agreement
- Re: RPMFusion repos and fedora-upgrade
- Re: RPMFusion repos and fedora-upgrade
- Re: RPMFusion repos and fedora-upgrade
- Re: RPMFusion repos and fedora-upgrade
- Re: Complex licensing interactions for OpenLMI
- RPMFusion repos and fedora-upgrade
- JTF license agreement
- Re: julius licensing?
- Re: julius licensing?
- julius licensing?
- Re: License of docbook-style-xsl package
- License of docbook-style-xsl package
- From: Stanislav Ochotnicky
- Re: This code may be freely used and modified for any purpose
- This code may be freely used and modified for any purpose
- Re: perl-DBD-InterBase license
- Re: perl-DBD-InterBase license
- perl-DBD-InterBase license
- Re: Is this acceptable for Fedora
- Re: Is this acceptable for Fedora
- Re: Is this acceptable for Fedora
- Is this acceptable for Fedora
- Re: Perl packages and App::FatPacker output
- Re: Perl packages and App::FatPacker output
- Perl packages and App::FatPacker output
- Re: [WTF] openerp: what's this license (#1)?
- Re: [WTF] openerp: what's this license (#1)?
- Re: [WTF] openerp: what's this license (#1)?
- Re: [WTF] openerp: what's this license (#1)?
- Re: [WTF] openerp: what's this license (#1)?
- Re: [WTF] openerp: what's this license (#1)?
- [WTF] openerp: what's this license (#1)?
- [WTF] openerp: can a license look like this (#2)?
- [WTF] openerp: what's this license (#1)?
- Re: Question -> Ubuntu Font License
- Question -> Ubuntu Font License
- Re: Usage discrimination in Akismet (WordPress Plugin)
- Re: Usage discrimination in Akismet (WordPress Plugin)
- Re: Usage discrimination in Akismet (WordPress Plugin)
- Usage discrimination in Akismet (WordPress Plugin)
- Re: License question
- License question
- Re: license of catalog subpackages
- Re: mysql-python
- license of catalog subpackages
- Re: mysql-python
- Re: License doubts during review of the bijiben package
- Re: License doubts during review of the bijiben package
- Re: License doubts during review of the bijiben package
- License doubts during review of the bijiben package
- Re: mysql-python
- Re: mysql-python
- Re: mysql-python
- mysql-python
- Re: Cube game engine license
- Cube game engine license
- Re: python-requests relicensing question
- python-requests relicensing question
- Mesa 9.1 legal status
- From: Michael Cronenworth
- Re: Another Aladdin License
- Another Aladdin License
- Re: Distribution of IETF MIB files
- Re: Distribution of IETF MIB files
- Re: use of trademark'd names in pkg summary/description/.desktop-files?
- Re: use of trademark'd names in pkg summary/description/.desktop-files?
- use of trademark'd names in pkg summary/description/.desktop-files?
- Re: Distribution of IETF MIB files
- Distribution of IETF MIB files
- Re: mumps and metis licenses
- mumps and metis licenses
- Re: What license should I use for javax.el-api
- Re: What license should I use for javax.el-api
- Re: What license should I use for javax.el-api
- Re: What license should I use for javax.el-api
- Re: What license should I use for javax.el-api
- Re: What license should I use for javax.el-api
- Re: What license should I use for javax.el-api
- Re: What license should I use for javax.el-api
- Re: What license should I use for javax.el-api
- From: Stanislav Ochotnicky
- What license should I use for javax.el-api
- Re: Need legal review for perl-Net-IDN-Nameprep
- Re: Need legal review for perl-Net-IDN-Nameprep
- Fwd: FSNS requested the creation of a Serbian (Serbia) language translation for the project Fedora Project
- From: Free Software Network Serbia
- Re: GNU C-Graph license
- Re: Is this following guidelines?
- Is this following guidelines?
- GNU C-Graph license
- Re: Petrify license
- Re: by-nc-nd
- Petrify license
- by-nc-nd
- Re: CMBC license
- Re: CMBC license
- Re: CMBC license
- CMBC license
- Re: SALOME license
- Re: SALOME license
- SALOME license
- Re: Licence clarification: MTL4
- Re: Clarification of license mixture in Anki package
- Clarification of license mixture in Anki package
- Re: Licence clarification: MTL4
- Licence clarification: MTL4
- Re: winetricks
- winetricks
- Re: Orthanc - OpenSSL exception
- Re: Orthanc - OpenSSL exception
- Orthanc - OpenSSL exception
- Re: MIT +no-false-attribs License
- Re: License propagation in Maven pom.xml hierarchy
- License propagation in Maven pom.xml hierarchy
- From: Stanislav Ochotnicky
- Re: CC-BY-ND ok for Fedora?
- CC-BY-ND ok for Fedora?
- Python licensing for backported code
- Re: SOFA software license
- Re: SOFA software license
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: SciTech MGL Public License Version 1.0
- Re: SOFA software license
- Re: Zotero trademark issue
- Re: Choosing appropriate copyright and licences for ICC profiles
- Re: 'New' licenses
- Re: 'New' licenses
- Re: man-pages-* license tags
- Re: 'New' licenses
- Re: License question
- Re: License clarification dxflib
- License question
- man-pages-* license tags
- Choosing appropriate copyright and licences for ICC profiles
- Re: AFPL license
- AFPL license
- Zotero trademark issue
- Re: License clarification dxflib
- Re: Code licensed under CC-BY
- Code licensed under CC-BY
- Re: 'New' licenses
- Re: 'New' licenses
- Re: 'New' licenses
- Re: Copyright in the project
- Re: Copyright in the project
- Re: Copyright in the project
- Copyright in the project
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- 'New' licenses
- SciTech MGL Public License Version 1.0
- SOFA software license
- Re: Fwd: Re: [Scratch] scratch gpl licensing -- combining with apache, and gpl v3
- Re: Fwd: Re: [Scratch] scratch gpl licensing -- combining with apache, and gpl v3
- Re: Fwd: Re: [Scratch] scratch gpl licensing -- combining with apache, and gpl v3
- Re: Fwd: Re: [Scratch] scratch gpl licensing -- combining with apache, and gpl v3
- Re: Fwd: Re: [Scratch] scratch gpl licensing -- combining with apache, and gpl v3
- Re: Fwd: Re: [Scratch] scratch gpl licensing -- combining with apache, and gpl v3
- Re: Fwd: Re: [Scratch] scratch gpl licensing -- combining with apache, and gpl v3
- Re: Fwd: Re: [Scratch] scratch gpl licensing -- combining with apache, and gpl v3
- Re: Fwd: Re: [Scratch] scratch gpl licensing -- combining with apache, and gpl v3
- Fwd: Re: [Scratch] scratch gpl licensing -- combining with apache, and gpl v3
- Re: Fwd: Opinion request for the Sequence Library license
- Fwd: Opinion request for the Sequence Library license
- Re: License clarification dxflib
- Re: Question about License field
- Re: Question about License field
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Question about License field
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Re: Question about License field
- License clarification dxflib
- Re: Question about License field
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Question about License field
- Re: AFM parser license
- Re: Overall license and Creative Commons
- Overall license and Creative Commons
- Re: Update to Binary Firmware Exceptions
- Re: Update to Binary Firmware Exceptions
- Update to Binary Firmware Exceptions
- Re: tegracrm license
- tegracrm license
- AFM parser license
- Opinion request for the Sequence Library license
- Re: GNU GPL Exception
- GNU GPL Exception
- Re: I've got a permission "to use the code in any way I choose", but no license
- Re: I've got a permission "to use the code in any way I choose", but no license
- Re: I've got a permission "to use the code in any way I choose", but no license
- Re: I've got a permission "to use the code in any way I choose", but no license
- I've got a permission "to use the code in any way I choose", but no license
- Re: clarification: is "inactive" mp3 source code forbidden?
- Re: clarification: is "inactive" mp3 source code forbidden?
- Re: clarification: is "inactive" mp3 source code forbidden?
- Re: clarification: is "inactive" mp3 source code forbidden?
- Re: clarification: is "inactive" mp3 source code forbidden?
- Re: clarification: is "inactive" mp3 source code forbidden?
- clarification: is "inactive" mp3 source code forbidden?
- Re: Request for Clarification: License of unit test framework
- Request for Clarification: License of unit test framework
- Re: Java3D license anti-nuclear clause
- Java3D license anti-nuclear clause
- Re: Khronos Group OpenGL man documentation
- Khronos Group OpenGL man documentation
- Re: perl-FCGI licence
- Re: perl-FCGI licence
- Re: perl-FCGI licence
- Re: perl-FCGI licence
- Re: IBPP License
- perl-FCGI licence
- IBPP License
- Re: "University of Michigan" license
- "University of Michigan" license
- Re: xpp2 license - Indiana University 5-clause BSD-style addition?
- xpp2 license - Indiana University 5-clause BSD-style addition?
- From: Stanislav Ochotnicky
- gnome-boxes-nonfree license
- Re: License question
- Re: License question
- Re: License question
- Re: License question
- Re: License question
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- License question
- Re: new license: JDBM License
- Re: new license: JDBM License
- new license: JDBM License
- Re: OpenBIOS license
- OpenBIOS license
- Leptonica license
- Re: Guidelines clarification - including additional license texts
- Guidelines clarification - including additional license texts
- Could someone review erlang-sext?
- Expanding binary firmware exceptions (slightly)
- Re: Packaging oVirt generated source
- Re: Gecode license
- Re: Packaging oVirt generated source
- Gecode license
- Re: missing ec and ecparam commands in openssl package
- OSGi Enterprise licensing
- Re: New license for imapsync
- New license for imapsync
- Re: missing ec and ecparam commands in openssl package
- Re: missing ec and ecparam commands in openssl package
- Re: missing ec and ecparam commands in openssl package
- Qwt license
- Re: NVidia tegra miniloader firmware license
- NVidia tegra miniloader firmware license
- Re: Packaging oVirt generated source
- Re: Packaging oVirt generated source
- Re: Packaging oVirt generated source
- Re: missing ec and ecparam commands in openssl package
- Re: Packaging oVirt generated source
- missing ec and ecparam commands in openssl package
- From: valent.turkovic@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: php-channel-* licence
- Re: php-channel-* licence
- Re: php-channel-* licence
- php-channel-* licence
- Re: Mixing BSD and Apache licenses for specific arch in jemalloc on EPEL5/ppc
- Mixing BSD and Apache licenses for specific arch in jemalloc on EPEL5/ppc
- Re: Android License for Gluster and Fedora Projec t (was Fwd: Change in glusterfs[master]: Provide missing basename_r and dirname_r)
- Re: Redistributing license text with binary RPMs
- Redistributing license text with binary RPMs
- Re: Trademarked items in a fedora package
- Trademarked items in a fedora package
- Re: MP3
- MP3
- Re: Packaging oVirt generated source
- Re: Packaging oVirt generated source
- Packaging oVirt generated source
- Re: Making Infrastructure httpd logs public
- Re: Making Infrastructure httpd logs public
- Re: Making Infrastructure httpd logs public
- Making Infrastructure httpd logs public
- Re: Fedora Inro/Outro Video Contest
- Fedora Inro/Outro Video Contest
- Re: Concern about the Clementine music player application
- Re: Floodgap Free Software License: ok for Fedora?
- Floodgap Free Software License: ok for Fedora?
- Concern about the Clementine music player application
- Re: Product logos in Boxes
- Re: New License for Xdebug
- New License for Xdebug
- Re: Privacy Policy Concern
- Re: How to specify license? CCDL or GPLv2 or ASL 2.0?
- Re: Privacy Policy Concern
- From: Karsten 'quaid' Wade
- Re: Privacy Policy Concern
- Re: Privacy Policy Concern
- Re: Liberation Font into an ePub
- Liberation Font into an ePub
- Re: Privacy Policy Concern
- Privacy Policy Concern
- Re: Licensing Tool (diploma thesis)
- Re: Licensing Tool (diploma thesis)
- Re: Licensing Tool (diploma thesis)
- Re: Licensing Tool (diploma thesis)
- Re: Licensing Tool (diploma thesis)
- Licensing Tool (diploma thesis)
- Fw: Re: Letter to Legal
- Re: python-virtualenvwrapper licensing
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- python-virtualenvwrapper licensing
- Re: *GPL ... approaching 1990s?
- Re: *GPL ... approaching 1990s?
- Re: *GPL ... approaching 1990s?
- *GPL ... approaching 1990s?
- Re: DTrace for Linux
- DTrace for Linux
- Re: How to specify license? CCDL or GPLv2 or ASL 2.0?
- Re: Comments on draft trademark guidelines regarding non-software merchandise produced by the Fedora Project
- Re: How to specify license? CCDL or GPLv2 or ASL 2.0?
- Re: How to specify license? CCDL or GPLv2 or ASL 2.0?
- Re: How to specify license? CCDL or GPLv2 or ASL 2.0?
- How to specify license? CCDL or GPLv2 or ASL 2.0?
- Re: Comments on draft trademark guidelines regarding non-software merchandise produced by the Fedora Project
- Re: Comments on draft trademark guidelines regarding non-software merchandise produced by the Fedora Project
- Comments on draft trademark guidelines regarding non-software merchandise produced by the Fedora Project
- Re: libzrtpcpp build faild: missing openssl/ec.h
- Re: Board question regarding non-software goods.
- Re: Board question regarding non-software goods.
- Re: libzrtpcpp build faild: missing openssl/ec.h
- Re: OpenSSH ECDSA support
- Board question regarding non-software goods.
- Re: OpenSSH ECDSA support
- Re: OpenSSH ECDSA support
- Re: OpenSSH ECDSA support
- Re: OpenSSH ECDSA support
- Re: OpenSSH ECDSA support
- Re: OpenSSH ECDSA support
- Re: CGAL license change to (L)GPLv3+
- Re: OpenSSH ECDSA support
- OpenSSH ECDSA support
- Re: Product logos in Boxes
- Re: Product logos in Boxes
- Re: Product logos in Boxes
- Re: Product logos in Boxes
- Re: Product logos in Boxes
- Re: Product logos in Boxes
- Re: Product logos in Boxes
- Re: Product logos in Boxes
- Re: Product logos in Boxes
- Product logos in Boxes
- Re: Is the lincense of RelaxNGCC compatible with Fedora?
- Is the lincense of RelaxNGCC compatible with Fedora?
- Re: Making my script collection available for fedora repos
- Making my script collection available for fedora repos
- Re: CGAL license change to (L)GPLv3+
- Re: CGAL license change to (L)GPLv3+
- Re: CGAL license change to (L)GPLv3+
- Re: CGAL license change to (L)GPLv3+
- Re: CGAL license change to (L)GPLv3+
- Re: ii package license
- Re: ii package license
- Re: ii package license
- From: Karsten 'quaid' Wade
- Re: ii package license
- Re: ii package license
- Re: ii package license
- Re: ii package license
- Re: ii package license
- Re: ii package license
- ii package license
- Re: python-timelib licensing
- python-timelib licensing
- Re: Creative Commons Attribution <_>
- Creative Commons Attribution <_>
- Re: packaging pregenerated kdelibs-apidocs
- Re: packaging pregenerated kdelibs-apidocs
- Re: packaging pregenerated kdelibs-apidocs
- Re: opinion on libmysqlclient derivatives work
- opinion on libmysqlclient derivatives work
- Re: packaging pregenerated kdelibs-apidocs
- Re: packaging pregenerated kdelibs-apidocs
- F17 feature (english typing booster) request for legal eyeballs.
- Re: packaging pregenerated kdelibs-apidocs
- Re: packaging pregenerated kdelibs-apidocs
- Re: packaging pregenerated kdelibs-apidocs
- packaging pregenerated kdelibs-apidocs
- Re: dt (data test tool) license
- Re: iozone license
- dt (data test tool) license
- Re: iozone license
- iozone license
- 3D-ICE terms and conditions
- OpenVera license agreement
- Re: Reusing upstart scripts from Ubuntu for EPEL6 Openstack packages
- Reusing upstart scripts from Ubuntu for EPEL6 Openstack packages
- Re: IDEA patent expiration?
- Re: IDEA patent expiration?
- Re: (no subject)
- Re: Legal opinion on license for EQP
- Re: Legal opinion on license for EQP
- Re: Legal opinion on license for EQP
- From: Karsten 'quaid' Wade
- Legal opinion on license for EQP
- Re: Chrome and VB?
- Re: Chrome and VB?
- Re: Chrome and VB?
- Re: Chrome and VB?
- Chrome and VB?
- From: Christopher Svanefalk
- Re: Is OpenCascade license now acceptable?
- Is OpenCascade license now acceptable?
- A change in Fedora's policy regarding Public Domain
- Re: possibly MIT license
- possibly MIT license
- Re: are copyright headers for all source files required?
- are copyright headers for all source files required?
- Re: SuperLU license
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- SuperLU license
- Re: RubyGems licensing while move to Ruby 1.9.3
- RubyGems licensing while move to Ruby 1.9.3
- Re: Suprem4 Stanford license clarification
- Re: Suprem4 Stanford license clarification
- Suprem4 Stanford license clarification
- Re: iLBC codec sources status
- iLBC codec sources status
- Legal approval of the mingw-w64 toolchain?
- LGPL and MPL
- Re: Research Software License Agreement
- Re: Research Software License Agreement
- Research Software License Agreement
- Re: Organization address (required for volunteer work)
- Organization address (required for volunteer work)
- Re: Is the Dxflib license free?
- Re: Is the Dxflib license free?
- Re: diffmark license
- diffmark license
- Re: Haskell Report License
- Re: Haskell Report License
- Re: Haskell Report License
- Re: What license tag to use for pcfi
- Re: What license tag to use for pcfi
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- What license tag to use for pcfi
- Haskell Report License
- Re: IDEA patent expiration?
- Re: IDEA patent expiration?
- Re: Is the Dxflib license free?
- Is the Dxflib license free?
- Re: Regarding presence of license information in source files
- Regarding presence of license information in source files
- From: lakshminaras2002@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Copyright requests
- IDEA patent expiration?
- Re: Copyright requests
- Copyright requests
- Re: About wrong value of License tag
- About wrong value of License tag
- Re: Inclusion of GPLv3 lib in GPLv2 work
- Re: Inclusion of GPLv3 lib in GPLv2 work
- Re: Inclusion of GPLv3 lib in GPLv2 work
- Re: Inclusion of GPLv3 lib in GPLv2 work
- Inclusion of GPLv3 lib in GPLv2 work
- Re: Bunling differently-licensed code for unit tests
- Bunling differently-licensed code for unit tests
- Re: Question on config files
- Question on config files
- From: Christopher Svanefalk
- Re: Licensing question
- Licensing question
- Re: Open Cascade Public License
- Open Cascade Public License
- Re: GIMP vs. poppler licensing, was: So you want to test an unstable GIMP...
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- GIMP vs. poppler licensing, was: So you want to test an unstable GIMP...
- Re: License change from LGPL to BSD
- Re: License change from LGPL to BSD
- License change from LGPL to BSD
- From: lakshminaras2002@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Tanukiwrapper license
- Tanukiwrapper license
- Re: Do I need to remove this from the source tarball
- Re: Do I need to remove this from the source tarball
- Do I need to remove this from the source tarball
- Re: incorrect fsf address
- incorrect fsf address
- Re: Codecs and using Fedora in the United States
- Re: Codecs and using Fedora in the United States
- Codecs and using Fedora in the United States
- Re: netperf license
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- netperf license
- Re: legal Digest, Vol 49, Issue 7
- Re: Stardict and unspecified legal issues
- Re: Stardict and unspecified legal issues
- Stardict and unspecified legal issues
- Re: Modified QPL
- Re: Modified QPL
- Modified QPL
- Re: License changelog?
- From: Christopher Svanefalk
- Re: License changelog?
- License changelog?
- From: Christopher Svanefalk
- Re: license question: glulxe
- Re: btanks license exception question
- Re: Embaroed Coutries
- btanks license exception question
- Embaroed Coutries
- Re: Use of Fedora icons in Eclipse
- Re: The Wild Magic License
- The Wild Magic License
- Use of Fedora icons in Eclipse
- Re: linuxsampler Licensing question
- Re: license question: glulxe
- linuxsampler Licensing question
- Re: license question: glulxe
- Re: DSDP license
- Re: DSDP license
- Re: eGenix public license 1.1.0
- Re: DSDP license
- Re: DSDP license
- Re: DSDP license
- Re: license question: glulxe
- Re: license question: glulxe
- license question: glulxe
- Re: Patents on Elliptic Curve Cryptography
- Patents on Elliptic Curve Cryptography
- Re: GPL and additional restrictions
- Re: GPL and additional restrictions
- Re: GPL and additional restrictions
- GPL and additional restrictions
- Re: itext AGPL licensing (round 2)
- Re: itext AGPL licensing (round 2)
- Re: itext AGPL licensing (round 2)
- itext AGPL licensing (round 2)
- DSDP license
- Re: LGPLv2+ statement
- LGPLv2+ statement
- Re: Use of Fedora icons
- eGenix public license 1.1.0
- Re: ssh enable and firewall open for sshd, connection by default after install who's legally liable?.
- Re: ssh enable and firewall open for sshd connection by default after install who's legally liable?.
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: ssh enable and firewall open for sshd connection by default after install who's legally liable?.
- Re: ssh enable and firewall open for sshd connection by default after install who's legally liable?.
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: ssh enable and firewall open for sshd connection by default after install who's legally liable?.
- Re: ssh enable and firewall open for sshd connection by default after install who's legally liable?.
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: ssh enable and firewall open for sshd connection by default after install who's legally liable?.
- Re: ssh enable and firewall open for sshd connection by default after install who's legally liable?.
- Re: ssh enable and firewall open for sshd connection by default after install who's legally liable?.
- Re: ssh enable and firewall open for sshd connection by default after install who's legally liable?.
- Re: ssh enable and firewall open for sshd connection by default after install who's legally liable?.
- ssh enable and firewall open for sshd connection by default after install who's legally liable?.
- From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Use of Fedora icons
- Re: Question about BSD style license
- Re: Are Yahoo Weather's terms of use okay for a Fedora package?
- Are Yahoo Weather's terms of use okay for a Fedora package?
- Returned mail: Data format error
- Re: Question about BSD style license
- Re: Question about BSD style license
- Re: Question about BSD style license
- Re: Question about BSD style license
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: Question about BSD style license
- Re: Question about BSD style license
- From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Question about BSD style license
- Re: Credit loss in Fedora translation files
- Credit loss in Fedora translation files
- Re: Usage of the Fedora logo on Mono's download info site
- Re: Usage of auto translate
- Usage of auto translate
- Usage of the Fedora logo on Mono's download info site
- Trademark license needed for
- Re: Use of trademarked operating system icons (eg. Windows logo) in Fedora programs
- Re: Use of trademarked operating system icons (eg. Windows logo) in Fedora programs
- Re: Use of trademarked operating system icons (eg. Windows logo) in Fedora programs
- Re: Use of trademarked operating system icons (eg. Windows logo) in Fedora programs
- Re: Use of trademarked operating system icons (eg. Windows logo) in Fedora programs
- Re: Use of trademarked operating system icons (eg. Windows logo) in Fedora programs
- Re: Use of trademarked operating system icons (eg. Windows logo) in Fedora programs
- Re: Use of trademarked operating system icons (eg. Windows logo) in Fedora programs
- Re: Use of trademarked operating system icons (eg. Windows logo) in Fedora programs
- Re: legal Digest, Vol 46, Issue 4
- Re: "Whatever" license
- Re: Use of trademarked operating system icons (eg. Windows logo) in Fedora programs
- Use of trademarked operating system icons (eg. Windows logo) in Fedora programs
- Re: "Whatever" license
- Re: "Whatever" license
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- "Whatever" license
- gSOAP
- Re: question on a new license
- Re: Required consent for mining Bugzilla data?
- From: Michel Alexandre Salim
- Re: Required consent for mining Bugzilla data?
- Required consent for mining Bugzilla data?
- From: Michel Alexandre Salim
- Re: OpenCASCADE Licence v. 6.5
- Re: OpenCASCADE Licence v. 6.5
- Re: OpenCASCADE Licence v. 6.5
- OpenCASCADE Licence v. 6.5
- Re: Possible incompatible licensing of audio files packaged with marave
- Re: driverproblem
- Possible incompatible licensing of audio files packaged with marave
- wimex
- driverproblem
- Re: Providing a copy of the GPL
- Re: Proper license field for GPL aggregation
- Re: Providing a copy of the GPL
- Re: Correct tag for GFDL 1.1 or later?
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Correct tag for GFDL 1.1 or later?
- Re: Questions from French NPO
- Questions from French NPO
- Re: Proper license field for GPL aggregation
- From: Michel Alexandre Salim
- Providing a copy of the GPL
- Re: Proper license field for GPL aggregation
- Re: Regarding c++ source with a separate license
- Re: Proper license field for GPL aggregation
- From: Michel Alexandre Salim
- question on a new license
- Re: Regarding c++ source with a separate license
- Re: Regarding c++ source with a separate license
- Re: Proper license field for GPL aggregation
- Regarding c++ source with a separate license
- From: lakshminaras2002@xxxxxxxxx
- hplip (hp-plugin) installs binary-only plugins and firmware into system directories without RPM control
- From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
- Re: Does License tag include manuals?
- From: Jason L Tibbitts III
- Does License tag include manuals?
- Proper license field for GPL aggregation
- From: Michel Alexandre Salim
- Re: Trademark approval for publishing books about Fedora
- Re: fluxbox has CC-BY-NC-SA files
- Re: fluxbox has CC-BY-NC-SA files
- Re: fluxbox has CC-BY-NC-SA files
- fluxbox has CC-BY-NC-SA files
- Re: [Fwd: Re: [publican-list] [Fwd: Re: r1722 - in trunk/publican-fedora: . .tx]]
- [Fwd: Re: [publican-list] [Fwd: Re: r1722 - in trunk/publican-fedora: . .tx]]
- Re: openNURBS toolkit license
- Re: openNURBS toolkit license
- openNURBS toolkit license
- Re: Forced copyright assignment
- Re: License header of some KDE applications
- Re: Drupal module licensing
- Re: Drupal module licensing
- Re: Drupal module licensing
- Re: Drupal module licensing
- Re: Drupal module licensing
- From: Lyos Gemini Norezel
- Re: possible ettercap license issue.
- possible ettercap license issue.
- Re: License header of some KDE applications
- Re: License header of some KDE applications
- Re: License header of some KDE applications
- Re: License header of some KDE applications
- Re: License header of some KDE applications
[Index of Archives]
[Fedora Users]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Fedora SELinux]
[Linux Kernel]