On 11/07/2012 11:00 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > That original Squeak image is a mix of MIT and Apache 2.0 license. My > concern is whether the final, combined image must be under the GPL v2 > license. My non-lawyer understanding is that it must, because it's certainly > not a case of "mere aggregation". But upstream's explanation is that it's > okay. If the case is just one where the Scratch binary depends on the Squeak VM to run, but they are separate code bases, there should be no issue. Is that the situation? ~tom == Fedora Project _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
