Hi,
I've got a BSD-licensed library up for review[1]. All of the code for
the library falls under the BSD license, but the package bundles an
LGPLv3-licensed unit test framework [2]. The unit test framework is
built and used in %check, but does not end up in the resulting binary
RPM. My question is, do I need to include LGPLv3 in the package's
license? Or, should I rm the LGPL source during %prep and exclude
%check? The guidelines tend to indicate I don't[3] need to include
LGPLv3 in the license field, but this particular case isn't treated in
the multiple licensing situations[4].
Thanks,
Rich
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=817193
[2] http://cu.danfis.cz
[3]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:FAQ?rd=Licensing/FAQ#Does_the_License:_tag_cover_the_SRPM_or_the_binary_RPM.3F
[4]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:FAQ?rd=Licensing/FAQ#Multiple_licensing_situations
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list
legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
