Re: Java3D license anti-nuclear clause

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/15/2012 03:03 PM, Eric Smith wrote:
> Re: Java3D package review,
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853
> 
> If upstream removed the word license from the clause, such that it read:
> 
>      You acknowledge that this software is not designed or intended
>      for use in the design, construction, operation or maintenance
>      of any nuclear facility.
> 
> Would that be acceptable for inclusion in Fedora?  Sun made that change
> for JavaCC, so it seems possible that Oracle might be willing to do that
> for Java3D, if they're not willing to drop the clause entirely.

Yes, that is how this issue was fixed the last time.

~tom

==
Fedora Project
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list
legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux