On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 00:22 -0400, Tom Callaway wrote: > In this case, I dug out the file from the SRPM, and determined that > the > license on the md5.c file is "zlib", which is fine for Fedora. > > License tag should be: > > License: BSD and zlib Hi Tom, Thanks for the quick reply. I had a tiny clarification to make: The md5 implementation that this package uses (and the one you saw) is the one by Peter Deutsch[1] and is listed here[2]. The latter page only says that one must provide a virtual provides: in the spec, Provides: bundled(md5-deutsch) It does not mention addition to the License: tag. So, should I add both, the zlib as a license and a virtual provides? Thanks, Regards, Ankur [[User:ankursinha|FranciscoD]] [1]https://fedoraproject.org/w/uploads/2/22/Deutsch-md5.c [2]https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries#Requirement_if_you_bundle _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
