On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 07:08:34AM +0100, Matej Cepl wrote: > On 27.2.2012 01:29, Richard Fontana wrote: > >It may call into question the choice of the LGPL to begin with > >though. (That may not be an unreasonable guideline: for a new > >project, never use a license that is lengthier than the code you > >would be placing under it.) > > Is this anti-Lesser GPL (pro pure-GPL) rant, or do you mean that > authors should use for shorter things > MIT/BSD/some-other-short-license? It's not specific to LGPL, but more a comment on where relatively simpler licensing may be more appropriate. - RF _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
