On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Tom Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 06/03/2011 04:12 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote: >> On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 13:43 -0600, Ken Dreyer wrote: >>> Most of the software in the package is GPL. However, one dependency >>> (glulxe) has some terms that I am not sure about. Is the glulxe >>> license acceptable in Fedora? I've pasted it below. >>> >>> The source code in this package is copyright 1999-2010 by Andrew Plotkin. >>> You may copy and distribute it freely, by any means and under any conditions, >>> as long as the code and documentation is not changed. You may also >>> incorporate this code into your own program and distribute that, or modify >>> this code and use and distribute the modified version, as long as you retain >>> a notice in your program or documentation which mentions my name and the >>> URL shown above. >> >> Looks like MIT to me. Â(I do not speak for Fedora Legal.) > > It's MIT-ish, but definitely distinct and different. Still working out > the details, stay tuned. > On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Tom Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > It's MIT-ish, but definitely distinct and different. Still working out > the details, stay tuned. Any updates? Please let me know if I need to block FE-LEGAL on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/682544 to keep this in the queue. - Ken _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
