Originally I thought I understood the multiple license stuff in the packaging guidelines, but it's become apparent that it's not understood by some people, or maybe just me. If an executable is build from sources with a mix of GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ and MIT, does the License tag need to include all three, or just GPLv2+? Examples, package reviews for psi4 and 64tass: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=951582 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973448 Thanks! Eric _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal