License tag for single binary built from multiple sources under different licenses

[Eric Smith <brouhaha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Originally I thought I understood the multiple license stuff in the
packaging guidelines, but it's become apparent that it's not
understood by some people, or maybe just me.

If an executable is build from sources with a mix of GPLv2+ and
LGPLv2+ and MIT, does the License tag need to include all three, or
just GPLv2+?  Examples, package reviews for psi4 and 64tass:
    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=951582
    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973448

Thanks!
Eric
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list
legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal