Re: non-free licence? (Richardson laboratory software)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday, 15 July 2013 at 23:10, Tom Callaway wrote:
> On 07/15/2013 04:56 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I'm considering packaging reduce from here:
> > http://kinemage.biochem.duke.edu/software/reduce.php
> > 
> > However, the licence seems to be non-free, despite saying
> > "This is free software":
> > http://kinemage.biochem.duke.edu/software/index.php
> > [...]
> > // NOTICE: This is free software and the source code is freely
> > // available. You are free to redistribute or modify under the
> > // conditions that (1) this notice is not removed or modified
> > // in any way and (2) any modified versions of the program are
> > // also available for free.
> > // ** Absolutely no Warranty ** 
> > 
> > Am I correct?
> 
> That is a poorly worded license. You might email them and ask them to
> clarify the meaning of clause (2). I still think I'd want them to reword
> it or drop it though. If they mean "free" as in "not for sale", it is
> non-free. If they mean "free" as in "under the same license terms",
> maybe... although I could still read that as potentially non-free. I'm
> not sure what they're trying to prevent in clause (2).

Thanks, Tom. That's what I thought as well. I sent them an e-mail asking
to relicense under MIT or BSD if possible or at least clarify the text.

Regards,
Dominik
-- 
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu
"Faith manages."
        -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list
legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux