On 01/26/2012 03:30 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: > For reference, > 235M kdelibs-apidocs-4.7.4-1.fc16.noarch.rpm Maybe this is a silly question, but is this package really valuable? Does anyone really want 235MB of apidocs, especially given the legal complexity/concerns, and the availability of these docs on the kde.org website? Perhaps killing this subpackage off entirely is a clever way of avoiding this situation. Additionally, I'm very uncomfortable with the idea of permitting packaging this specific type of pregenerated content, especially when it would not necessarily match the kdelibs it refers to. That said, here is my initial thoughts on this situation: LGPL is a VERY poor license for these documentation files. I'd be happier if the kdelibs license had a case where the apidocs generated from the kdelibs files were explicitly stated to be under a proper docs license. In fact, in my initial attempt to apply the LGPLv2 terms to the apidocs case, I ran into 2a) "The modified work must itself be a software library.", which the apidocs are not. So, I'm not even convinced anyone aside from the copyright holders actually has permission to redistribute the apidocs (as a "modified work" of the LGPLv2 kdelibs). Just trying to figure out a way for this to work under the LGPLv2 is giving me a migraine. The simplest way to fix this would be to amend the kdelibs license to say something like: As an exception to the LGPL, documentation generated from this library for the purposes of documenting the API of this library is licensed under the terms of the *INSERT_YOUR_DOC_LICENSE_HERE*. That still leaves you with the particular compliance requirements of whatever doc license you choose, but depending on the license chosen, it is entirely possible that the apidocs would not have a requirement to be accompanied with matching kdelibs source (my reading of GFDL for example is such that the apidocs, assuming they are in a suitably Transparent copy (as defined by the GFDL) can be distributed independently of the kdelibs source they refer to). ~tom == Fedora Project _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
