On 03/29/2011 03:15 AM, Jiri Kastner wrote: > hi, > with release 6.5 of OpenCASCADE changed license. > i noticed, that https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/Open_CASCADE_Technology_Public_License is quite old. > on http://www.opencascade.org/getocc/license/ is the new one. > can you, please, review this license if is still 'BAD' one? > thanks in advance. The only changes since the last review (6.2) are: * An updated mailing address for Open CASCADE S.A.S. * A slightly reworded summary (which is not part of the license) * A typo fix in section 4 * Removal of items referencing the version of the license within the license itself So, no, this license is still non-free. I have updated the Fedora wiki with the 6.5 license. It is worth noting that in 2009, I was told by several people involved with Open CASCADE that it was their intent to work "toward a licence change. This licence will definitely be a standard license fully recognised by the oSS such as GPL/LPGL, just to keep it as simple as possible." However, that has clearly not happened. I suspect the fact that Ubuntu accepted opencascade into Universe, even though it is clearly non-free, is one of the reasons why they do not feel motivated to fix their license. ~tom == Fedora Project _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
