On 12/13/2011 06:14 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: > Hello list, > I'm trying package perl-Wx-Scintilla, which has lot of problems. But at > the moment I'd like to solve license. The main package is licensed "same > as Perl". Two files are under wxWindows, which is the same as wxWidgets > license. But there is also directory under some kind of MIT. > > <license> > License for Scintilla and SciTE > > Copyright 1998-2003 by Neil Hodgson <neilh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > All Rights Reserved > > Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its > documentation for any purpose and without fee is hereby granted, > provided that the above copyright notice appear in all copies and that > both that copyright notice and this permission notice appear in > supporting documentation. > > NEIL HODGSON DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES WITH REGARD TO THIS > SOFTWARE, INCLUDING ALL IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY > AND FITNESS, IN NO EVENT SHALL NEIL HODGSON BE LIABLE FOR ANY > SPECIAL, INDIRECT OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES OR ANY DAMAGES > WHATSOEVER RESULTING FROM LOSS OF USE, DATA OR PROFITS, > WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER > TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE > OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE. > </license> > > Could you clarify it this is MIT and if I can mark it as package under > "(GPL+ or Artistic) and wxWidgets and MIT" ? Yes, this is MIT, and the marking is fine. ~tom == Fedora Project _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
