On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:07:35AM -0500, Tom Callaway wrote: > On 11/13/2012 06:07 AM, Jaromir Capik wrote: > > We've been told, that Fedora and RHEL RPMs differ > > in the licensing so that RHEL RPM specs should have > > listed licenses for binary and source packages, whilst > > the Fedora RPM specs should have listed licenses for > > binary packages only. > > > > Is that right? > > > > In fact we're redistributing the sources in form of SRPMs > > and that's why I see this only as a matter > > of our choice/policy/approach. > > > > Please, let me know if you could send us any statement > > about that, since we're already getting quite confused. > > I can't comment on RHEL policies, but I do not believe there is a way to > indicate the License tag for a SRPM in a way that is different from the > binary RPMs (whereas, it is possible to indicate a different License tag > for each binary subpackage). Currently, RHEL policies regarding License tags are the same as Fedora's. Jaromir, please follow up with me off-list for questions about RHEL (since this is a Fedora list). - RF _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
