On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 04:08:06PM +0200, Alec Leamas wrote: > On 2013-04-10 16:03, Tom Callaway wrote: > >On 04/09/2013 11:08 PM, Richard Fontana wrote: > >>On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 12:41:02AM +0200, Alec Leamas wrote: > >>>HI all! > >>> > >>>openerp 7.0 have some files with license below. Is it possible to > >>>conclude an effective license for this? (AGPL 3.0+ and LGPL 2.1+)? Or is > >>>it just an invalid attempt to relicense? > >>On its face this is no good. > >I concur that this is a very weird mix. > > > >~tom > > > >== > >Fedora Project > Yes... Any ideas how to cope with it out there? I have filed an > upstream bug, but they are not that responsive. > > Basically, I think i t would be helpful with a conclusion that it's > either possible to use in Fedora or not. Seems just on a superficial glance like something upstream might be able to correct with a license change. But if they're not responsive, not sure what more you can do. - RF _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
