Dear list, I'm packaging the ii IRC client [1] for Fedora and the package reviewer has expressed concerns about its license. This software includes, in addition to the main MIT-licensed code, the following script: http://hg.suckless.org/ii/file/d163c8917af7/query.sh I've decided to use "MIT and Public domain" as the package license. Would that be correct? Thanks in advance, Petr [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784589
Attachment:
pgptoCK3oO5W2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
