Re: ii package license

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3.2.2012 12:57, Josh Boyer wrote:
It's similar to WTFPL, but not enough to be called that.  Spot is
at FOSDEM, so this will probably need to wait until he looks it
over.  If it were me, I'd ask upstream to relicense it to something
a bit more standard in any case.

"ask upstream"? You must be new here.

This is from the upstream which one of his programs have this as enlisted advantage of the program: "Because dwm is customized through editing its source code, it’s pointless to make binary packages of it. This keeps its userbase small and elitist. No novices asking stupid questions."

Matěj
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list
legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux