On Fri, 2013-03-15 at 16:29 +0800, Mathieu Bridon wrote: > Hi, > > I'm reviewing bijiben: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=919265 > > Pierre-Yves is both the submitter of the package as well as the upstream > developer. > > The review is in a state where I think the package can be approved, > except for the license. > > I'm having doubts about the value of the license tag, but that's mostly > because it's slightly more complicated than what I've dealt with until > now. > > I've looked at all the source files, and the result appears to me to be: > GPLv3+ and (LGPLv2 or LGPLv3) and LGPLv2+ > > - The LGPLv2+ files are libgd, which is (by design) bundled into > bijiben. > - The "LGPLv2 or LGPLv3" files come from Evolution > - The GPLv3+ is most of the software, it is the source code for bijiben > > Pierre-Yves simplified that to: > GPLv3+ and LGPLv3 and LGPLv2+ > > Which I don't think is a problem. > > Could anyone have a look and confirm that the License tag is correct? > > I'm sure I'm being overly worried for no reason and it's a very simple > case, but as I said, I've never reviewed a package with so many licenses > before. :) Anyone? -- Mathieu _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
