On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Tom Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> so we permit people to mark that package as simply "GPLv2+".
> However, it is also correct to list out all the licenses in play
> ("GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ and MIT"). It is left to the packager to determine
> which option they feel comfortable using.
Thanks for the clarification. That makes perfect sense.
Eric
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list
legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
