On 01/31/2012 04:57 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Tom Callaway wrote: >> So, from a purely license compliance perspective, shipping the apidocs >> without the matching sources in Fedora is a no-go. It's also a no-go >> from a "everything must be built from source" rule. > > That (both parts) is what I already told Rex, too, he just wouldn't believe > me. ;-) > > Our current approach of building kdelibs-apidocs as a subpackage of kdelibs > looks compliant to me though, isn't it? Yes, but I circle back to the original question I posed: Is this package really valuable? Does anyone really want 235MB of apidocs, especially given the legal complexity/concerns, and the availability of these docs on the kde.org website? ~tom == Fedora Project _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
