On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 02:57:17PM -0500, Richard Fontana wrote: > I don't see any problem here. Okay, as long as that's the official answer I'm happy. > I would note that the MIT code is apparently GPLv2+ rather than GPLv2. The web site just says GPL v2, and the license file starts by being explicit about the version number "Scratch 1.4 is licsend under the GPL v2" with no "or later version" clause -- but it is ambiguous in the next sentence. -- Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁ <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
