On 02/06/2013 01:57 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote: > But I think that the intention of Oracle is for GPLV2 with exceptions > and ASL 2.0 to be a valid combination since that is what they use for > every project that combines GPLv2 (only) code with ASL 2.0 code (like > glassfish, netbeans, openjdk, etc.). So while choosing CDDL and ASL 2.0 > in this case is technically a valid choice it seems nicer (more in line > with upstream) to leave the optional GPLv2 with exceptions choice intact. > If only because that is consistent with how other packages currently > do it and so you can more easily find this class of sources. Oracle might intend for that to be their choice of licenses, but it is a terrible one, since GPLv2 only (with or without the exception) + ASL 2.0 results in something where no one (besides the copyright holder(s)) can actually comply with the license terms. ~tom == Fedora Project _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
