Quoting David Xie (2013-02-06 16:53:57) > Dear all, > > I am making a RPM package for javax.el-api, however I am not sure which license > should I use for it. > From page http://uel.java.net/, it claims it uses license CDDL and GPLv2. > Should I add ASL 2.0 for it? > > Now I am using "(CDDL or GPLv2) and ASL 2.0". To give more context, this is related to a review we are working on[1]. Basically all source files have a CDDL+GPL license header with ASL 2.0 being listed because they apparently based their code on apache code. I uploaded example header to fpaste[2]. [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907909 [2] http://paste.stg.fedoraproject.org/3693/ -- Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky@xxxxxxxxxx> Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno PGP: 7B087241 Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
