On 05/29/2013 05:51 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote: > I'm currently packaging python-subunit at: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/908842 > > This is an ASL 2.0 project, but there is a single > python file used at build time only that is GPLv2. > I.E. this file is shipping in the tarball (srpm), > but removed from the rpms. > > Is this a valid thing to do, or do we need > a tarball with this file removed? > > Note even if I wanted to license the package > as "ASL 2.0 and GPLv2", I don't think that's possible, > as they're incompatible licenses: > http://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html It is not a problem. Just make sure it isn't in the binary rpms. You do not need to regenerate the source tarball. The License: field reflects the contents of the binary RPM, not the SRPM. The SRPM just needs to be 100% free, and GPLv2 meets that. ~tom == Fedora Project _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
