On 05/26/2011 10:11 AM, Jaromir Capik wrote: > Hi. > > I'd like to know if the following statement can be considered a LGPLv2+. > I somehow cannot find the LGPLv2+ template. > I found just LGPLv2 templates which differ a bit and since I'm unsure > what the extra plus sign means, I considered it a good question > for this mailing list. > > /* > * Hibernate, Relational Persistence for Idiomatic Java > * > * Copyright (c) 2008, Red Hat Middleware LLC or third-party contributors as > * indicated by the @author tags or express copyright attribution > * statements applied by the authors. All third-party contributions are > * distributed under license by Red Hat Middleware LLC. > * > * This copyrighted material is made available to anyone wishing to use, modify, > * copy, or redistribute it subject to the terms and conditions of the GNU > * Lesser General Public License, as published by the Free Software Foundation. Yes, this is LGPLv2+, since no version is specified. ~tom == Fedora Project _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
