Proper license field for GPL aggregation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



If a package's source is under a GPL-compatible license (say MIT), and 
it links against a GPL library (say readline's GPLv3+), what should the 
license field say? Maybe "MIT and GPLv3", with a comment explaining 
which library pulls in the GPLv3 requirement?

Thanks,

-- 
Michel

_______________________________________________
legal mailing list
legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux