On 01/18/2012 03:07 AM, Dan Horák wrote: > I think the right to modify the code is missing (only the author can > distribute modified code in the second sentence) making it non-free as a > whole. This is correct. The iozone license is non-free, I spent sometime trying to convince the upstream to use a free license a few years ago, and they did consider it, but they decided that since iozone is a benchmark suite, they did not want anyone else to have the right to modify the codebase. ~tom == Fedora Project _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
