On 12/01/2011 08:51 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Hi, > > I am preparing Ruby 1.9.3 for Fedora 17 and I came to interesting > license question. Ruby was always double licensed, i.e. Ruby and GPLv2. > However, Ruby 1.9.3 is going to be licensed under Ruby and BSD license. > The interesting part is, that there is certain amount of gems, which are > "distributed under the same conditions as ruby". For example > rubygem-POpen4, rubygem-thin, rubygem-cairo. > > Does that apply that the gems are going to be licensed with the same > version of Ruby in distribution? Or if they distribute the LICENSE file > of Ruby 1.8.7, where is specified that the license is same as Ruby, > which means GPLv2 or Ruby is this enough? Is it necessary to clarify the > license with every upstream due to this change? Ick. I think we're going to need to clarify this licensing change with every upstream. ~tom == Fedora Project _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
