On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 01:36:37PM -0500, Tom Callaway wrote: > On 02/06/2013 01:27 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 11:31:23AM -0500, Tom Callaway wrote: > >> So, for Fedora, > >> while "(CDDL or GPLv2) and ASL 2.0" is technically correct, it is > >> impossible for Fedora to ever choose GPLv2, so the simpler license tag > >> would be: > >> > >> CDDL and ASL 2.0 > > > > I think (pedantically) the correct license tag should be: > > (CDDL or GPLv2 with exceptions) and ASL 2.0 > > That is at least what other Glassfish derived packages use since it > > isn't "pure" GPLv2 only. > > Yes. But it doesn't change the analysis. :) By my standards of pedanticism it should just be CDDL. - RF _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
