On 06/04/2012 10:31 AM, Juan Hernandez wrote:
On 04/23/2012 06:18 PM, Yaniv Dary wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Juan Hernandez"<juan.hernandez@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Yaniv Dary"<ydary@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Tom Callaway"<tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx>, legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 7:01:22 PM
Subject: Re: Packaging oVirt generated source
On 04/23/2012 05:20 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
On 04/23/2012 10:50 AM, Juan Hernandez wrote:
We would like to package for fedora the Data Ware House component
of
oVirt, which contains parts generated using Talend Open Studio
(see [1]).
This tool allows the user to define graphically some data flows
and
transformations and then generates Java code. The generated Java
code
states in the header that the license is LGPL and the tool itself
claims
to be open source using GPL v2 (see [2]).
Is it acceptable from the legal point of view to create a Fedora
package
using the generated Java code as the source?
Is _all_ code generated via Talend Open Studio automatically marked
as
being LGPL, or is this a decision that the use generating the Java
code
makes consciously?
I think that all the code is marked LGPL, there is no other
alternative.
Yaniv, can you confirm this?
This is correct.
Tom, did you get this response from Yaniv Dary? Any comments?
Anyone has an insight on where it is acceptable or not to package
generated source?
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list
legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
