On 08/01/2012 05:25 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > I'm trying to get OpenBIOS re-admitted to Fedora: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844748 > http://tracker.coreboot.org/trac/openbios/browser/trunk/openbios-devel > > The code is a hodge-podge of files from various sources. I've > attached the output of licensecheck to this email. > > So the question is, do I just jam together all the known licenses into > a string, ie. > > License: BSD and GPLv2 and [etc] > > or do we use the main license (GPLv2), or something else? There are a lot of files without per-file licensing in that mix. I'm not overly concerned about it though, since there seems to be a clear lineage from the Linux kernel, libc, and libgcc. I think listing all the licenses in play might make sense here, although since GPLv2 is in play (and not just GPLv2+), that will almost certainly end up being the strictest license, so it could just simplify down to GPLv2. Either way works for me. ~tom == Fedora Project _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
