Allow to delete builds/coprs from playground? (was: Re: Meeting minute from Env-and-Stacks WG meeting (2014-04-15))

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/15/2014 04:22 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
============================================
#fedora-meeting: Env and Stacks (2014-04-15)
============================================


Meeting started by mmaslano at 12:01:12 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-04-15/env-and-stacks.2014-04-15-12.01.log.html

.



Meeting summary
---------------
* init process  (mmaslano, 12:01:30)
   * LINK:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Workstation_Enable_Software_Collections

     (jreznik, 12:10:17)

* Playground repository  (tjanez, 12:32:45)
   * LINK: https://github.com/fedora-haskell/common/blob/master/common.mk
     very low-tech :)  (juhp, 13:53:18)
   * ACTION: hhorak will add an item to the playground open questions
     about deleting the packages/builds already introduced in playground
     and will send the summary of the irc discussion to the mailing list
     to continue  (hhorak, 14:04:32)

Added to open questions:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Env_and_Stacks/Playground_repository_%28draft%29#Open_Questions

And these are actually the comments from today's meeting worth keeping in mind: * people install packages and later then we are not able to find the source for those packages
* disc space for copr builds is very limited
* rawhide deletes old builds as well but we can always find the source in dist-git (not possible in copr) * keeping only srpms could be enough (for me personally it seems like the compromise) * we're not sure if deleting packages in playground would violate GPL (legal list CC'd and the question could be -- "Is it violation of GPL if we offer RPMs and SRPMs at some point and delete them after some time?" -- now it seems like common scenario, happening every day, but rather asking to be sure)

Regards,
Honza

   * We may follow the Workstation group's "Proposed System Wide Change:
     Workstation: Enable Software Collections" and discuss it on the
     devel list  (hhorak, 14:12:48)
   * mirek-hm talked about "dnf playground enable" which would enable all
     copr repos in playground  (hhorak, 14:15:59)
   * We talked about scenario that playground would be implemented by
     "copr with playground flag" + "dnf plugin working with such corps".
     No voting done. No final decisions.  (hhorak, 14:19:57)

Meeting ended at 14:21:35 UTC.




Action Items
------------
* hhorak will add an item to the playground open questions about
   deleting the packages/builds already introduced in playground and will
   send the summary of the irc discussion to the mailing list to continue




Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* hhorak
   * hhorak will add an item to the playground open questions about
     deleting the packages/builds already introduced in playground and
     will send the summary of the irc discussion to the mailing list to
     continue
* **UNASSIGNED**
   * (none)




People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* juhp (122)
* mmaslano (66)
* hhorak (47)
* tjanez (43)
* mirek-hm (26)
* jreznik (13)
* drago01 (6)
* jwb (5)
* zodbot (4)
* Southern_Gentlem (4)
* pkovar (2)
* bkabrda (0)
* samkottler (0)
* abadger1999 (0)
* drieden (0)




Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4

.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot

_______________________________________________
env-and-stacks mailing list
env-and-stacks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/env-and-stacks

_______________________________________________
legal mailing list
legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Gnome Users]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux