On 01/24/2015 11:13 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
>>>>>> "MT" == Mamoru TASAKA <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> MT> This Japanese text says:
>
> Wow, thanks! At least it's clearly unacceptable and we don't have to
> get into the legal nuances of Japanese translation.
>
> So this falls back to the question of whether the apx developer's
> statement that upstream relicensed the font is sufficient.
While I'd like to have seen some specific documentation supporting the
relicensing, I have no reason to doubt the apx upstream in this manner.
It is fine for Fedora to consider the font to be CC-BY.
~tom
==
Red Hat
null
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list
legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
