Is this license, used by Tahoe-LAFS, acceptable for Fedora (and EPEL)? https://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/browser/trunk/COPYING.TGPPL.rst?rev=18b44383dc45c9f8dba9cb0149682bded6941028 As you can see, the file starts with a list of exception clauses granting additional permissions, similar to some of the common GPL+exceptions licenses. The license body looks OK to my non-expert eyes; the main differences seem to be that the copyleft requirements are allowed under some circumstances to be delayed for up to a year (section 1c), and the external deployment provisions (section 5), which I think are similar to the AGPL. If there are any issues with the license preventing it from being packaged for Fedora, I think the author may be amenable to working them out. Thanks, Eric _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
